Local Government
The case for local control over housing

The case for local control over housing

By Matt Levin.

Cities and homeowner groups — often reluctant to allow the building of denser housing in their backyards — are frequently blamed for California’s soaring housing costs.

But advocates for local control argue that state housing interventions, including many supported by Gov. Gavin Newsom, risk eroding the character of their neighborhoods. And they say that state efforts to prod more development ignore the strains on infrastructure and local budgets that will inevitably accompany new development.

“There are yards and fences and gateways and flowers and trees that are showing a kind of love and appreciation for the intermingling between nature and beautiful construction and caring and neighborliness,” said Susan Kirsch, a slow-growth activist from Marin County, as she described her hometown of Mill Valley.

“This is in contrast to the big-box apartments going up in so many places really without any sense of aesthetics or beauty or inviting quality.”

On this episode of Gimme Shelter, the California Housing Crisis Podcast, Matt Levin of CalMatters and Liam Dillon of the Los Angeles Times discuss the case for local control over housing decisions with Kirsch and Juan Garza, mayor pro tem of the Southern California city of Bellflower.

Originally posted at Calmatters.

Comments

comments

Share this Story

Related Posts

Sign Up for our Daily Newsletter!