awesome hot Blacksummers'night DVD DIVX Hardwired cool album Kings Of Leon USA G-Force video DVD music Obsessed (Official Remix) qualitive Crank: High Voltage avi buy hot Day and Age qualitive avi The Matrix buy R&B - Various Artists music cool avi Australia
![]() Issues Surround Red Light CamerasWritten by Lance Howland |
| October 12, 2009 |
In San Rafael, it will be traffic-ticket trick or treat.On Halloween, the 30-day warning period ends and motorists start getting for-real tickets for running red lights documented by cameras at the intersection of Irwin and Third streets. San Rafael is the first city in Marin County to set up cameras to document drivers lead-footing it through red lights. The city has a contract with a vendor to process video, digital images and mail notices of expensive fines. Motivated by traffic safety and revenue enhancement, more cities are starting such programs even as problems arise, such as:
“We want to meet all the legal requirements and the public safety requirements,” said Rohrbacher. “We want people to stop for that light.” Cameras snap four pictures of the potential violations, license plate and the driver’s face (state vehicle code requires the latter in order to issue a traffic ticket), according to a city news release. There is a video of 12 seconds of the vehicle approaching, passing through and leaving the intersection. A city officer reviews images before a ticket is issued. Violators can review the video on a password-protected Web site or come to the police station to see it. Redflex Traffic Systems of Arizona charges the city of San Rafael $5,900 a month per approach (there are cameras on two approaches at Irwin and Third) with the potential to expand to 10 approaches. The intersections were identified in studies of traffic patterns and collision data by the vendor, police and the city’s traffic engineer. The process resulted in enhancing safety at Irwin and Third by extending the yellow light period from 3.0 to 3.5 seconds and adding a one-second interval when it’s red lights all around the intersection. “It provides some slack for drivers,” said Rohrbacher. Before starting a red-light camera system, cities should study traffic issues, document the need and thoroughly analyze companies making bids, advised Rob Sharpnack, a Costa Mesa Police Department sergeant. The Costa Mesa City Council is contemplating changes as it monitors the travails of its vendor. Earlier this year, Nestor Traffic Systems went into receivership and, in September, its assets were purchased by American Traffic Solutions. In Costa Mesa, Nestor was the vendor since the city started a red-light camera program in 2003, planning a phase-in installation of cameras at 20 intersections. The vendor’s problems in meeting phase-in targets, as well as billing and record-keeping errors, were cited in Sharpnack’s Aug. 22 review of the program for the council. The city devotes about 30 hours a week of civilian staff time to the program. The review (click here to read) compared four intersections in 2001-03 (before camera installation), and 2006-08, drawing parallels to the same periods for four similar intersections that had no cameras. It found that total collisions in the camera intersections actually increased 13 percent, while they decreased in the four control intersections. But the number of injury collisions decreased 15 percent in the camera intersections (from 55 in 2001-03 to 47 in 2006-08) compared to an increase of 2 percent in the control intersections. More than 100 cities in California have red-light cameras. The number of cities (and number of intersections) is increasing, said Steve Miller, the president of Ticketbust.com, a Westlake Village company that offers customers their money back if the firm cannot enable them to get red-light camera tickets dismissed or reduced. The company is a document-filing service for California trial by written declarations that offers customers a way to contest a ticket without going to court, Miller said. The company provides knowledge of court systems and decisions that have cited red-light camera contract language for indirectly encouraging the writing of more tickets if revenues flag. The company taps into public outrage expressed in blogs and city council meetings, particularly in Southern California, over issues of entrapment, incentives and expense. The tickets typically exceed $400 — after allowances for the vendors’ cut, and distributions to the city, county and state as regulated by state vehicle code. In Corona, a political controversy has arisen over the idea of making tickets less expensive by cutting out vendors and having city staff process administrative citations. A handful of cities have terminated red-light camera programs in recent years, citing court decisions (Fullerton), the need (Roseville) and allegations of ticket quotas (Fairfield), according to media reports. Napa started a red-light camera program in the spring after thoroughly studying programs in the Sacramento area and the South Bay, said police Cmdr. Andy Lewis. Napa staff started with two intersections. In early October, police went back to the city council asking for authorization to install cameras on three more intersections and hire a part-time person to help with processing. The council approved the request by a 4-1 vote, said Lewis. The public safety improvement is promising, Lewis said, based on preliminary data. From April 30 to Sept. 16, citywide there were nine collisions and nine injuries attributed to red-light running vehicles. For the same period last year (before cameras), the citywide numbers were 19 such accidents with 23 injuries. “It’s going well,” Lewis said. “Everyone likes it — until they get caught.” Lance Howland can be reached at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it - Trackback(0)
Comments (4)
![]()
...
written by Liberty, October 22, 2009
RED LIGHT CAMERA TICKETS DEFEATED IN CALIFORNIA. google it.
...
written by Liberty, October 22, 2009
RED LIGHT CAMERA TICKETS DEFEATED IN CALIFORNIA
http://libertyfight.741.com/red_light_scam_victories.html
...
written by Henry, October 18, 2009
Residents and visitors to Marin need to beware: Once the 30-day grace period is over, San Rafael may mail out "Snitch Tickets," fake/phishing red light camera tickets designed to bluff the registered owner into ID'ing the actual driver of the car. (Other local cities using them are Daly City, Elk Grove, Fairfield, Marysville, Millbrae, Modesto, Newark, Redding, Rocklin, San Leandro, San Mateo, Stockton and Union City.) Snitch Tickets were invented because California is one of the states where camera tickets are "driver responsibility" rather than "owner responsibility." Snitch Tickets are simply a clever investigatory tool. They aren't filed at court (like a real ticket would be), so they don't say "Notice to Appear," don't have the court's address, and say (on the back, in small letters), "Do not contact the court." Since they have NOT been filed at court, they have no legal weight. You can ignore a Snitch Ticket. If in doubt, Google the term.
... written by enigmaforever, October 13, 2009
It isn't just about a violation. Why would a company want to have access to the ability to pull up plate numbers, and tell by simply entering license number, where that vehicle was at any time it passed any camera, even though the vehicles are not in violation of any laws, this goes on 24/7. If you passed any number of Redflex cameras going across the state or country even 6 months ago they can tell you where and when. Homeland security has a disclosed contract with Redflex to track American citizens. Pull up your plate number, and track you by a simple push of a button. Any Red light, highway, or in fact any surveillance camera any where in world you may drive. Who can get this information? No law stopping them from selling info to anyone, insurance co., spouses, enemies, detectives, and even the neighborhood stalker, or pedophile ( CameraFRAUD.com Post #: 749. "In June, Christopher Everette Jacobs, a Redflex employee in Longview, Texas was indicted on nine counts, including three of aggravated sexual assault, four of sexual performance by a child and two of possession or promotion of child pornography."“He was kind of a computer expert,” said [Sheriff] McCool, noting he worked for the company that manages the traffic cameras for Marshall and Longview." ..
Redflex cameras across the nation have had a strange virus which causes the traffic light they are at to shorten the time of the yellow usually to the 3 seconds required by federal law, but well below university study recommendations of 4.5. This does allow much more revenue for Redflex, and the cities, so when they say it is for safety, that is just a load of b.s.,. MPH Reaction Time Stopping Distance Total Distance 40 mph 44 feet 81 feet 125 feet Where Redflex cameras have shorten the yellow will someday kill if in fact they have not already done so. This is a company that touts safety but in fact many of their actions show that they care a whole lot more about revenue than protecting citizens. THE COLUMBUS DISPATCH "A Columbus City Council member whose committees oversee legislation dealing with road construction, red-light cameras and environmental issues borrowed money from a lobbyist whose clients are interested in the same topics" "refused to disclose the amount of the loan ". Akron Becon Journal--"City Council president criticizes William Healy II for contracts involving campaign contributors" "Schulman pointed to two contributions of $125 each on July 8 from individuals associated with Redflex Traffic Systems Inc. of Phoenix" By Gerry Smith Chicago Tribune Reporter July 15, 2009 After Carol Stream Police Chief Rick Willing recommended his town hire Redflex Traffic Systems, village officials approved a contract with the Arizona-based red-light camera vendor in December 2007. Less than a year later, Willing retired from the force and began working for Redflex. Write comment
|