By Joel Fox.
At about the same time Gov. Jerry Brown was explaining his new initiative to reform the determinate sentencing law, Los Angeles County Sheriff Jim McDonnell was telling Town Hall Los Angeles that law enforcement was facing a losing battle with crime. The sheriff argued that ballot measures back to Proposition 36 in 2000 easing drug punishment through Proposition 47 voiding prison for some felonies and AB 109 prison realignment have led to increased crime.
Will Brown’s new initiative proposal add to the crime problem by making it easier for non-violent offenders to gain parole?
Sen. Jim Nielsen thinks so. He stated in a press release: “Violent and property crimes have increased in cities across the state from Sacramento to Los Angeles. Weakening the criminal justice system will only increase the victimization of California citizens.”
Nielsen laid the fault in the crime increase at Proposition 47, which reduced many felonies and misdemeanors, allowing arrestees to escape the threat of prison.
Sheriff McDonnell said he supported the spirit of what Prop 47 was trying to do but fixes are needed because it is not working. Prior to Prop 47, a criminal arrested for stealing goods valued less than $950, or on certain drug charges, faced either time in jail or a treatment program. McDonnell said the leverage of jail time no longer exists. People know they won’t get locked up for a theft under $950, he said.
The sheriff said the AB 109 prison re-alignment law put state prison inmates in county jails, which are not equipped to handle them. Jails are intended to house people pre-trial, not to house long-term prisoners, McDonnell said. One state prisoner shifted to the LA county jail is serving a 42-year term.
The realignment program was designed to free up space in state prisons. Brown’s proposed initiative would further that goal by giving judges and parole boards more discretion.
Allowing judges to judge specific circumstances and mete out appropriate justice is a common sense philosophy.
But at what cost to public safety?
While McDonnell said it wasn’t his intention to bash Prop 47, he noted that crime in the county was up 11.2% over the last year with 40% of those freed under Prop 47 re-arrested. One individual has been re-arrested 22 times.
McDonnell said he wanted to work with Prop 47 supporters to meet the goals of the initiative while at the same time adding fixes that return incentive and disincentives for individuals to obey the law.
One Prop 47 supporter who listened to the sheriff speak was Tom Hoffman, a long time law enforcement official who serves as a Senior Public Safety Adviser for the non-profit Californians for Safety and Justice, an organization that advocated for Proposition 47.
Hoffman took exception to the sheriff putting responsibility of increased crime on Prop 47. Hoffman said crime statistics all across the country have gone up about the same rate as in California.
Given reports of increased crime issued by the police and a recent spike in gun sales, it can be assumed citizens of California feel less safe. Yet, the governor’s initiative is counting on a changed attitude toward crime and punishment as indicated by the passage of Proposition 47 and the Three Strike law reform.
A couple of months ago I wrote that a spike in crime could bring back the rise of politicians like former Gov. George Deukmejian who rode a tough-on-crime image to high state offices. If the Brown gambit adds to the perception that crime is increasing because of government actions there likely could be a political push-back.